The requirement that an owner receive a one-eighth royalty,
58 P.S. §33, on oil and gas extracted under a lease (the “GMRA”) remains unchanged
under SB 259. The provision for the escalation of royalties remains unchanged
from the current rules of 58 P.S. §34.
The bill requires additional information to be listed on
royalty check stubs that owners receive from well operators. In particular,
Section 3.2 of SB 259 would require royalty check stubs to include:
- identification information for the lease, property, unit or well(s) for which the royalty is being paid;
- the month and year of production;
- the total volume of oil and gas produced;
- the price per unit of volume (barrel, Mcf or gallon);
- taxes and deductions permitted in the lease, except for windfall profit taxes;
- net value of the total sales less above taxes/deductions;
- interest owner’s interest (decimal or fraction) for production described by the identifying information;
- interest owner’s share of total value prior to taxes/deductions;
- interest owner’s share of sales less interest owner’s share of taxes/deductions;
- And the contact information of the well operator.
If, however, the well operator already has another basis for
regularly providing this payment information to landowners, then it need not
provide it in the royalty check stubs.
Additionally, where a single operator has the right to
develop multiple contiguous properties separately, the operator may develop the
leases jointly under Section 2.1, unless the leases expressly prohibit doing
so. Previously, well operators were not able to jointly operate leases in
Pennsylvania unless joint operation was expressly permitted in the leases,
normally through a pooling clause. Section 2.1 now implies the well operator’s
right to jointly operate multiple contiguous leases unless expressly prohibited
by the language of a lease.
Further, Section 2.1 allows the well operator to calculate
the royalty shares of each lease “in such proportion as the operator reasonably
determines to be attributable to each lease.”
Lastly, SB 259 Section 3.4 states that division orders,
which list the proportion of a landowner’s interest in a group of pooled
properties, cannot amend or supplement the terms and conditions of an oil and
gas lease. Where the lease and order may conflict, the oil and gas lease is
controlling.
For more information on SB
259, please visit the Pennsylvania General Assembly site.
Written by: Garrett Lent, Research Assistant
Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
July 2013
Written by: Garrett Lent, Research Assistant
Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
July 2013
Well troops forced pooling has come to Pa but unlike other states NO current/upgraded lease ; terms/compensations or surface protections , what a huge "boon" to the legacy o/g operators and the HBP/HBS operator companies , they no longer have to bother with lease modifications or negotiations , let alone paying for the upgrade to secure pooling /unitization rights. Kris A Vanderman Esq. Charleroi Pa.
ReplyDelete