Showing posts with label Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Show all posts

Monday, October 16, 2017

Shale Law Weekly Review - October 16, 2017

Written by Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.

National Energy Policy: EPA Proposes to Repeal Clean Power Plan
On October 10, 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to repeal the Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, better known as the Clean Power Plan. The EPA proposes that the regulations exceeded the agency’s statutory authority and that repeal of the regulations will “facilitate the development of U.S. energy resources.” The purpose of the Clean Power Plan was to establish guidelines for states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing fossil-fuel electric generating units.

Pipelines: FERC Grants NEXUS Pipeline Permission to Begin Construction
On October 11, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) granted NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC’s request to proceed with the construction of the NEXUS pipeline project. The grant omits several locations and activities from the approval. To obtain approval for the omitted activities, NEXUS must file information required by various Environmental Conditions issued by FERC. The NEXUS pipeline is a 255-mile interstate pipeline that will deliver 1.5 Bcf/d of natural gas from eastern Ohio to Michigan.

Local Regulation: Ohio Supreme Court Declines to Compel Certification of Ballot Proposal that Would Prohibit Drilling
On October 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio declined to compel the Mahoning County Board of Elections (Board) to certify petitions for inclusion on the election ballot (The State ex rel. Flak et al. v. Betras et al., Slip Opinion, No. 2017-Ohio-8109). One of the proposed amendments to the ballot, The Water Amendment, would declare that the people within the city of Youngstown have the right to clean air and water. This amendment would prohibit actions violating that right, including oil and gas drilling and extraction. The Board had determined that the proposed amendments contained provisions exceeding the scope of the city’s authority. The court held that the Board may refuse to certify proposed ballot amendments if the matter is beyond their authority to enact.

Pipelines: Court Refuses to Vacate Dakota Access Pipeline Easement While New EIS is Prepared
On October 11, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia refused to vacate the easement granted to the Dakota Access pipeline (Standing Rock v. Army Corps, No. 16-1534). This decision follows a court ruling from June where the judge ruled that the Army Corps of Engineers’ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was inadequate. The court here held that the inadequacies in the EIS were not “fundamental or incurable flaws,” and therefore, halting the use of the pipeline would be an inappropriate remedy.

Pipelines: National Academies of Science Report Examines Natural Gas Pipeline Transportation
On October 11, 2017, the National Academies of Science introduced a new report, Safely Transporting Hazardous Liquids and Gases in a Changing U.S. Energy Landscape which analyzes the transportation of hazardous materials like oil, ethanol, and natural gas by pipeline, barge, and railroad. The report found that pipeline unintentional releases, or spills, have not increased and most year-to-year fluctuations are the result of major incidents. The research indicates that the increase of pipeline mileage and traffic will result in more pipeline spills in the future. In addition, release mechanisms like corrosion and cracking or excavation damage will add to the amount of spills over time. Advanced pipeline construction methods could limit spills, but pipeline maintenance, integrity management and leak monitoring are vital to suppressing future spills.

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

See our Global Shale Law Compendium and this week’s article, Shale Governance in Australia. (Western Australia, South Australia, and Queensland)

Check out this week’s Shale Law in the Spotlight: Status and Overview of BLM Hydraulic Fracturing Rule

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Study says stray methane gas in drinking water is more abundant closer to gas wells

On June 24, 2013, Robert Jackson, the Nicholas Professor of Global Environmental Change at Duke University, published a study that detailed the relationship between methane, propane and ethane found in drinking water wells, and the proximity of the well to hydraulic fracturing sites. The 2013 study followed a 2011 study of sixty drinking water wells in the northeast Pennsylvania Marcellus region. After it was published, the 2011 study received criticism from the gas industry for not testing enough wells, and failing to demonstrate that the increased levels of methane were a given consequence of drilling, rather than faulty well casing or cementing. The 2013 study surveyed an additional 81 wells in the region, including wells from Ostego County in New York (where fracking has not been conducted).

The study showed an increased concentration of methane gas in drinking water from wells closer to a drilling site. Specifically, water wells within one kilometer of gas wells exhibited six times the concentration of methane of other wells. The methane gas in the water wells consistently bore a thermogenic signature (which matches signatures of methane trapped in the deeper shale formations currently being drilled), rather than a biogenic signature (which matches shallower pockets of methane).

The study offered two explanations for the increased presence of methane. First, it acknowledged the possibility of inadequate steel casings in gas wells; and second, it suggested imperfections in cement sealings between casings in gas wells could be responsible for the methane’s presence in water wells.

For more information on the study, visit the website for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

Written by: Garrett Lent, Research Assistant
Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center
June 2013