Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Shale Law in the Spotlight: Natural Gas Severance Taxes in the United States (Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia)

Written by Chloe Marie – Research Fellow

This series will address severance taxes on natural gas imposed by natural gas-producing states and this first article will review the severance tax system for the states of Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.

Pennsylvania

The state of Pennsylvania does not levy a severance tax, but rather imposes an impact fee on unconventional gas wells. Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf has repeatedly proposed a severance tax on unconventional natural gas extraction, but each time the proposal has failed to advance through the Pennsylvania General Assembly.

For the year 2015-2016, Governor Wolf proposed to impose a severance tax at a rate of 5% on natural gas extracted at the wellhead plus a fixed tax amount of 4.7 cents per volume MCF. This proposal set a pricing floor for producers at $2.97 per Mcf – meaning that each time the average market price was below $2.97, the pricing floor would have been used to calculate the severance tax. In 2016, Governor Wolf proposed a severance tax at a rate of 6.5% of the value of the natural gas. In the 2017-2018 Pennsylvania Executive Budget issued on February 7, 2017, Governor Wolf once again proposed a severance tax of 6.5% of the value of natural gas extracted with the possibility to convert the amount paid in impact fee as credit against the severance tax.

In Pennsylvania, the state Public Utility Commission (PUC) is responsible for administering the impact fee – also called the unconventional gas well fee – as well as overseeing its collection and distribution to local governments and state agencies (58 Pa. C.S. chap. 23). Every unconventional gas producer must pay this fee to the Commission for each well they spud each calendar year. The impact fee is calculated based on the average annual price of natural gas and the age of the well.

All fees must be collected and deposited in the Unconventional Gas Well Fund no later than April 1 of each year and then distributed from the fund no later than July 1 of each year following a specific formula. Prior to the distribution of any funds to local government entities, funds are distributed to state agencies as follows (funds are increased annually based on the Consumer Price Index):
·       PA Fish and Boat Commission - $1,000,000
·       PA Public Utility Commission - $1,000,000
·       PA Department of Environmental Protection - $6,000,000
·       PA Emergency Management Agency – $750,000
·       PA Office of State Fire Commissioner - $750,000
·       PA Department of Transportation - $1,000,000
·       PA Housing Affordability and Rehabilitation Enhancement Fund - $2,500,000
·       County conservation districts - $7,500,000

Once these initial distributions have been made, 60% of the remaining revenue must be distributed to local governments on the basis of the following formulas:
·       36% to counties based on the number of spud wells in each county;
·       37% to municipalities based on the number of spud wells in each municipality; and
·       27% to municipalities based on the number of spud wells in each county based on the proximity to the wells, the total population and the total highway mileage of the eligible municipalities within the county.

The remaining revenue must be deposited in the Marcellus Legacy Fund and distributed to state agencies and projects, including:
·       20% to the Commonwealth Financing Authority 
·       10% to the Environmental Stewardship Fund
·       25% to the Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account
·       25% for water and sewer projects
·       15% for greenways, trails, recreation, open space, etc.
·       5% to the Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED); however funds not utilized by the DCED must be deposited in the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Fund.

For drilling in 2016, the Commission collected and appropriated $173,258,900.00, which amount is a small decline compared with previous years.  The Pennsylvania PUC sets forth the previously received amounts as follows:
·       2015 - $187,711,700.00
·       2014 - $223,500,000.00
·       2013 - $225,752,000.00
·       2012 - $202,472,000.00
·       2011 - $204,210,000.000

Ohio

The severance tax is set at 2.5 cents per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of natural gas extracted. The Ohio Revised Code provides for an annual exemption applicable to landowners using natural gas produced from their own wells; however, this exemption is limited to the extent that natural gas resources should not exceed a cumulative market value of $1,000 per year (ORC § 5749.02(A)(6)).

As for the revenue distribution, 10% is deposited in the Geological Mapping Fund while the other 90% is deposited in the Oil and Gas Well Fund (ORC § 5749.02(B)(4)). Payments are made electronically each quarterly period.

In addition to the severance tax, well owners are subject to an oil and gas regulatory cost recovery assessment, with an exception provided for an exempt domestic well (ORC § 1509.50). The cost recovery assessment is calculated on a quarterly basis using a formula that takes into consideration the amount of severance taxes paid, the amount of oil and gas production, and the total number of wells owned or being reported. The amount of severance taxes is added to the assessment based on production and the resulting sum is then compared to the minimum assessment amount – which is $15 per well. The severance taxes are subtracted from the greater of the two amounts to arrive at the assessment amount due.

West Virginia

In West Virginia, a severance tax has been set at 5% of gross value of natural gas measured at the wellhead (WVC § 13A). Before July 1, 2016, natural gas producers also had to pay an additional severance tax by volume of 4.7 cents to state Tax Commissioner. The money received from this additional tax used to be deposited in the Workers’ Compensation Debt Reduction Fund to pay off debts associated with the state-run workers’ compensation system prior its privatization in 2006. On February 29, 2016, however, Governor signed SB 419 into law terminating the Workers’ Compensation Debt Reduction Act and thus also terminating the payment of this additional 4.7 cent tax as of July 1, 2016.

The West Virginia Code provides for severance tax exemptions applicable to wells producing less than 5 Mcf of natural gas per day and wells not producing marketable quantities for 5 consecutive years, which exemption is for up 10 years.


90% of the revenue from the severance tax is then deposited in the West Virginia General Fund and the first $24 million of the revenue collected is distributed to debt service for infrastructure bonds. The remaining 10% is distributed to counties and municipalities. Of this percentage, 75% is distributed to oil and gas producing counties, and 25% is distributed to all counties and municipalities based on population densities.

Monday, October 16, 2017

Shale Law Weekly Review - October 16, 2017

Written by Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.

National Energy Policy: EPA Proposes to Repeal Clean Power Plan
On October 10, 2017, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to repeal the Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, better known as the Clean Power Plan. The EPA proposes that the regulations exceeded the agency’s statutory authority and that repeal of the regulations will “facilitate the development of U.S. energy resources.” The purpose of the Clean Power Plan was to establish guidelines for states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing fossil-fuel electric generating units.

Pipelines: FERC Grants NEXUS Pipeline Permission to Begin Construction
On October 11, 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) granted NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC’s request to proceed with the construction of the NEXUS pipeline project. The grant omits several locations and activities from the approval. To obtain approval for the omitted activities, NEXUS must file information required by various Environmental Conditions issued by FERC. The NEXUS pipeline is a 255-mile interstate pipeline that will deliver 1.5 Bcf/d of natural gas from eastern Ohio to Michigan.

Local Regulation: Ohio Supreme Court Declines to Compel Certification of Ballot Proposal that Would Prohibit Drilling
On October 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio declined to compel the Mahoning County Board of Elections (Board) to certify petitions for inclusion on the election ballot (The State ex rel. Flak et al. v. Betras et al., Slip Opinion, No. 2017-Ohio-8109). One of the proposed amendments to the ballot, The Water Amendment, would declare that the people within the city of Youngstown have the right to clean air and water. This amendment would prohibit actions violating that right, including oil and gas drilling and extraction. The Board had determined that the proposed amendments contained provisions exceeding the scope of the city’s authority. The court held that the Board may refuse to certify proposed ballot amendments if the matter is beyond their authority to enact.

Pipelines: Court Refuses to Vacate Dakota Access Pipeline Easement While New EIS is Prepared
On October 11, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia refused to vacate the easement granted to the Dakota Access pipeline (Standing Rock v. Army Corps, No. 16-1534). This decision follows a court ruling from June where the judge ruled that the Army Corps of Engineers’ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was inadequate. The court here held that the inadequacies in the EIS were not “fundamental or incurable flaws,” and therefore, halting the use of the pipeline would be an inappropriate remedy.

Pipelines: National Academies of Science Report Examines Natural Gas Pipeline Transportation
On October 11, 2017, the National Academies of Science introduced a new report, Safely Transporting Hazardous Liquids and Gases in a Changing U.S. Energy Landscape which analyzes the transportation of hazardous materials like oil, ethanol, and natural gas by pipeline, barge, and railroad. The report found that pipeline unintentional releases, or spills, have not increased and most year-to-year fluctuations are the result of major incidents. The research indicates that the increase of pipeline mileage and traffic will result in more pipeline spills in the future. In addition, release mechanisms like corrosion and cracking or excavation damage will add to the amount of spills over time. Advanced pipeline construction methods could limit spills, but pipeline maintenance, integrity management and leak monitoring are vital to suppressing future spills.

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

See our Global Shale Law Compendium and this week’s article, Shale Governance in Australia. (Western Australia, South Australia, and Queensland)

Check out this week’s Shale Law in the Spotlight: Status and Overview of BLM Hydraulic Fracturing Rule

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.

Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Shale Law Weekly Review - October 10, 2017

Written by Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.

Local Regulation: Federal Court Holds Home Rule Charter to be Preempted by State and Federal Law
On September 29, 2017, The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania invalidated several provisions of the Home Rule Charter for Highland Township, Pennsylvania. (Seneca Res. Corp. v. Highland Twp. et al., No. 16-cv-289). The provisions in the Charter prohibited the injection of wastewater fluid from drilling activities. Seneca Resources Corporation (Seneca) is an oil and gas exploration and production company. Seneca received a permit from the Environmental Protection Agency to operate an injection well. Highland Township declared that the permit was invalid under their Charter, and Seneca initiated this lawsuit. The court held that the Charter was preempted by federal law under the Safe Drinking Water Act and by state law, Act 13.
Eminent Domain: Texas Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Lawsuit Against Trans-Pecos Pipeline
On October 3, 2017,  the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a landowner’s motion for preliminary injunction in a lawsuit against Trans-Pecos Pipeline, L.L.C. (Boerschig v. Trans-Pecos Pipeline, No 16-50931). The Trans-Pecos Pipeline is a 148-mile natural gas pipeline in Texas operated by Energy Transfer Partners. The pipeline’s route will pass through landowner John Boerschig’s ranch. After negotiations failed, Trans-Pecos began condemnation proceedings under Texas eminent domain law. Boerschig brought this lawsuit arguing that allowing a private company to condemn private property is an offense to due process. The court held that Boerschig was unable to establish a likelihood of success on his constitutional challenge and, therefore, is not entitled to a preliminary injunction against Trans-Pecos.
Pipelines: Ohio Issues Water Quality Permit for NEXUS Pipeline
On September 19, 2017, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) issued a Water Quality Certification for the NEXUS pipeline. The NEXUS pipeline will be a 255-mile natural gas pipeline delivering 1.5 Bcf/d from eastern Ohio to Michigan. Ohio EPA requires NEXUS to have contingency plans to prevent or manage any unanticipated spills. Ohio EPA has set dates for public hearings in October and will take public comment for the next 30 days.
Public Lands: Court Holds BLM Does Not Have Authority to Delay Natural Gas Venting Rule
On October 4, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted the plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment in the lawsuit over the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) rule,  Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation (Sierra Club, et al. v. Zinke, et al, 17-cv-03804-EDL). The purpose of the rule was to reduce natural gas waste from venting, flaring, and leaks resulting from oil and gas activities on Federal and Indian leases. California, New Mexico, and the Sierra Club sued BLM when they attempted to postpone compliance for the rule. The court here vacates the Postponement Notice and held that BLM did not have the authority to postpone the rule. In response, on October 5, 2017, BLM proposed to suspend or delay the rule to avoid industry costs because the rule may be rescinded or revised.  Comments on this proposed rule will be accepted until November 7, 2017.
International: Scottish Government Decides to Prohibit Hydraulic Fracturing
On October 3, 2017, the Scottish government announced that it will not support the continued use of hydraulic fracturing for the development of oil and gas. In January 2015, the Scottish government put in place a moratorium on allowing new oil and gas development in the country, pending a public consultation. The public consultation, Talking ‘Fracking’: A Consultation on Unconventional Oil and Gas - Analysis of Responses was released on October 3, 2017. After analyzing the results, the government concluded that “the overwhelming majority of respondents were opposed to the development of an unconventional oil and gas industry in Scotland.”

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

See our Global Shale Law Compendium and this week’s article, Shale Governance in Australia.

Check out this week’s Shale Law in the Spotlight: Overview of Utah's Laws and Regulations Related to Oil and Gas Air Emissions

Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.