Showing posts with label Drilling permit application. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drilling permit application. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2020

Shale Law Weekly Review - April 27, 2020

Written by:
Sara Jenkins – Research Assistant 
Jackie Schweichler – Staff Attorney
Brennan Weintraub – Research Assistant
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.
Production and Operation: Oklahoma Corporation Commission Approves Emergency Order Allowing Oil Producers to Shut-in Wells in Response to COVID-19
On April 22, 2020, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission announced approval of an emergency order allowing oil producers to shut-in or reduce production of oil wells for the prevention of waste.  The order was approved in response to a request from LPD Energy Company LLC seeking to prevent waste by stopping or reducing oil production without impacting the company’s lease agreement.  The request stated that due to a decline in demand and oversupply from COVID-19 circumstances, LPD is losing $200,000 per month by producing “economically challenged” wells.  At a hearing on April 17, 2020, the Commission heard testimony and made findings.  No objections to the requested relief were filed or received at the hearing.  The Commission’s Media Advisory stated that the order “gives those operators the freedom and flexibility they need to respond to market forces and decide what actions to take to survive.”

Water Quality: EPA Issues Final Rule Defining Waters of the United States
On April 21, 2020, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a final rule regarding the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act.  The rule is titled “The Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’” and replaces the previous 2015 WOTUS rule The new rule follows President Trump’s Executive Order 13778, which required review of the 2015 WOTUS rule to ensure navigable waters were kept pollution-free while also promoting economic growth.  Additionally, the Executive Order directed EPA to define “navigable waters” in a way that was consistent with Justice Scalia’s opinion in Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006).  The final rule’s interpretation of WOTUS includes: “territorial seas and traditional navigable waters; perennial and intermittent tributaries; . . .  certain lakes, ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters; and [adjacent] wetlands.”  The final rule also defines waters that are considered “non-jurisdictional,” and as such are excluded from the definition of WOTUS.  The final rule will take effect on June 22, 2020.

Production and Operation: Government Accountability Office Finds Thousands of Approved Oil and Gas Drilling Permits Not Being Used
In March 2020, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report finding that thousands of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) approved drilling permits were not in use. (p. 2).  The report is titled, Oil and Gas Permitting: Actions Needed to Improve BLM’s Review Process and Data System.  The report states that between 2014 and 2019, BLM approved 19,941 drilling permits for wells, out of which 9,991 permits were not being used.  Additionally, during the same time period, 2,628 applications for permits remained under review and 1,137 of the applications were denied by BLM.  GAO made three recommendations to BLM, suggesting that they develop a consistent and documented process for prioritizing permit applications and that BLM should formalize its data processing systems.  BLM only agreed with GAO’s third recommendation to “document and implement corrective actions for the data system based on lessons learned.” 
From the National Oil & Gas Law Experts:
George A. Bibikos, At the Well Weekly (Apr. 17, 2020)

AGENCY PRESS RELEASES—STATE/FEDERAL
Pennsylvania Department of Energy Press Releases:

U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
STATE ACTIONS—EXECUTIVE/LEGISLATIVE
Pennsylvania Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
No actions Apr. 27, 2020. 

Pennsylvania Legislature:
No actions Apr. 20 - 27, 2020.

FEDERAL ACTIONS—EXECUTIVE/LEGISLATIVE
Federal Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
Energy Department
85 FR 23013 “Epcilon LNG LLC; Application for Long-Term, Multi-Contract Authorization to Export Domestically Produced Natural Gas Through Mexico to Non-Free Trade Agreement Countries After Liquefaction to Liquefied Natural Gas” Notice (Apr. 24, 2020)
85 FR 23014 “Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC; Application for Blanket Authorization to Export Previously Imported Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Countries on a Short-Term Basis” Notice (Apr. 24, 2020)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
85 FR 22730 “Port Arthur LNG Phase II, LLC, PALNG Common Facilities Company, LLC; Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review of the Port Arthur LNG Expansion Project” Notice (Apr. 23, 2020)
85 FR 22730 “Guardian Pipeline LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization” Notice (Apr. 23, 2020)
85 FR 22733 “Black Marlin Pipeline LLC; Notice of Filing” Notice (Apr. 23, 2020)
85 FR 23017 “Dakota Natural Gas, LLC; Notice of Application” Notice (Apr. 24, 2020)

Land Management Bureau
85 FR 22750 “Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease COC-77358, Colorado” Notice (Apr. 23, 2020)
85 FR 22750 “Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease COC-77272, Colorado” Notice (Apr. 23, 2020)

House Energy and Commerce Committee Actions:
No new actions Apr. 20–27, 2020.

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Actions: 
No new actions Apr. 20–27, 2020.
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks:
“Keystone XL Hits Another Snag in Court,” Rigzone
Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.
Want to get updates, but prefer to listen? Check out the Shale Law Podcast! We can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Stitcher.
Check out the February Agricultural Law Brief ! Each month we compile the most significant legal developments in agriculture. If you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe!

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

U.S. District Court of New Mexico Denies Motion to Enjoin BLM from Approving Drilling Permits in the Mancos Shale Formation

On August 14, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico denied a motion to enjoin the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from continuing to approve drilling permit applications in the Mancos Shale formation.

The DinĂ© Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment sued BLM in March 2015 alleging that the agency’s approval of drilling permits violates the fundamental requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). In their claims, the environmental organization contends that BLM’s 2003 Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement did not analyze the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing for developing the Mancos Shale formation.

On April 11, 2015, the environmental organization filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent BLM from approving more applications for permits to drill in the Mancos Shale formation during the pending litigation.

The U.S. District Court denied the motion for preliminary injunction concluding that the environmental organization had failed to demonstrate the balance of harms between the parties.  As stated in the Court’s opinion, “[i]f the Court were to issue the requested preliminary injunction, and the Plaintiffs were to lose the case on the merits, then the Defendants would almost certainly lose whatever income their BLM-approved wells would have produced in between the issuance of the preliminary injunction and the resolution of the case. The Plaintiffs, on the other hand, will sustain only the enhanced possibility of an injury, rather than an injury certain, if the Court denies the Motion.”

The case remains pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico at docket no. 1:15-cv-00209-JB-SCY. 

Written by Chloe Marie - Research Fellow
08/18/2015