Showing posts with label Colorado Oil and Gas Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Colorado Oil and Gas Commission. Show all posts

Monday, February 4, 2019

Shale Law Weekly Review - February 4, 2019

Written by:
Brennan Weintraub - Research Assistant
Jackie Schweichler - Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.

Pipelines: FERC Issues EIS for Northeast Supply Enhancement Project
On January 25, 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued the final  environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (Project).  The EIS addresses the environmental effects of miles of pipeline located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania; Middlesex and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey; and Queens and Richmond Counties, New York.  The EIS also evaluates several facilities and the effects of compressor stations located in Chester County, Pennsylvania and Somerset County, New Jersey.  FERC concluded that the project will result in some adverse environmental impacts that can be reduced to “less-than significant levels” provided the implementation of recommended mitigation measures.  The project is operated by Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC and will provide natural gas to Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and Long Island.  

PA Impact Fee: Pennsylvania Expected to See Increase in Impact Fee Collections for 2018
On January 24, 2019, the Pennsylvania Independent Fiscal Office released its estimate of state impact fee collections for 2018 and projected a total amount of $247 million.  The estimation indicates an overall increase of $37.4 million from the previous year. The report found that approximately $15.1 million of the increase was due to new wells, while the remaining $22.3 million consisted of outstanding payments from wells previously involved in litigation. Of the $247 million generated by the impact fee in 2018, the Office estimates that roughly $137 million will go to counties, municipalities, and the Housing Affordability and Rehabilitation Enhancement Fund.  The remaining funds will go to the Marcellus Legacy Fund, Commonwealth Agencies, and Conservation Districts/Commission.

GHG Emissions: Governor of New Mexico Issues Executive Order on Greenhouse Gas Emissions
On January 29, 2019, the Governor of New Mexico issued Executive Order 2019-003, which establishes a goal of reducing the state’s greenhouse gas emission levels by 45% during the twenty-five year period from 2005 to 2030. To achieve this goal, the order requires the creation of a Climate Change Task Force comprised of state agency heads, which will set emissions limits for pollutants and seek to reduce vehicle emissions, in particular. The order also requires that the Environment Department and Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department jointly develop a program to reduce methane emissions from oil and gas activities in the state.

State Regulation: North Dakota Commission Alters Crude Oil Conditioning Requirements
On January 19, 2019, the Industrial Commission of North Dakota announced that it had amended crude oil conditioning requirements in the state. Notably, the amendments will alter the frequency of vapor pressure testing and the time of year in which such testing occurs. This, the Commission said, would improve the efficiency of testing while continuing to address concerns about safety and marketability of crude oil.

State Regulation: Colorado Supreme Court Denies Motion to Vacate Decision Regarding Proposed Oil and Gas Rule
On January 28, 2019, the Colorado Supreme Court denied a motion to vacate or reconsider and modify its decision in a case regarding a proposed rule the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (Commission) declined to consider (Martinez v. Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission, No. 2017SC297).  The plaintiffs are young residents of Colorado who petitioned the Commission to issue a rule that would suspend the issuance of hydraulic fracturing permits until it could be shown that the drilling process will not negatively impact human health and the environment.  The Colorado Supreme Court determined that the Commission properly declined the rulemaking under the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Act.  The plaintiffs filed a motion to vacate the decision in light of the order vacating the dissenting opinion of district court judge Laurie Booras.  The Colorado Supreme Court relied on and cited Judge Booras’s dissent in its decision.  Judge Booras’s dissent was vacated after the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline determined that the judge had engaged in activities undermining her “integrity, independence, and impartiality.”  A timeline and additional documents related to this case can be found here.

From the National Oil & Gas Law Experts:
George Bibikos, At the Well Weekly, (January 25, 2019)

Charles Sartain, Texas Court Addresses Bad Acts in a Lease Play, Energy and the Law (January 31, 2019)

Pennsylvania Legislation:
HB 178: would amend Oil and Gas Act to include a natural gas tax on unconventional operations. (Referred to House Environmental Resources and Energy - Jan. 28, 2019)

HB 187: would dedicate a portion of Pennsylvania’s impact fee to communities with impacts from pipelines  (Referred to House Environmental Resources and Energy - Jan. 28, 2019)

HB 247: would allow unconventional well bores to cross multiple units (Referred to House Environmental Resources and Energy - Jan. 28, 2019)

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks:

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Want to get updates, but prefer to listen? Check out the Shale Law Podcast! We can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.


Check the January Agricultural Law Brief! Each month we compile the biggest legal developments in agriculture. If you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe!

Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Shale Law Weekly Review - January 22, 2019

Written by:
Brennan Weintraub - Research Assistant
Jackie Schweichler - Staff Attorney

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.

State Regulation: Colorado Supreme Court Declines to Impose Additional Rulemaking Responsibilities upon State Oil and Gas Agency
On January 14, 2019, the Colorado Supreme Court issued an opinion overturning a lower court ruling that required the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) to incorporate additional environmental considerations into its permitting decisions. (COGCC v. Martinez, No. 17SC297).  This case was brought by a group of youth activists who proposed a rule that would allow COGCC to issue permits for drilling only when there would not be cumulative adverse impacts to human health and the environment.  The plaintiffs initially submitted the proposed rule for consideration by COGCC, arguing that it was consistent with the legislative purpose of the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Act.  COGCC unanimously rejected the proposed rule, finding that it did not possess the statutory authority to issue such a rule under existing law and that it was already working with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to address many of the concerns raised by the plaintiffs. The Supreme Court agreed with COGCC and declined to require that the proposed rule be adopted.

Municipal Regulation: Colorado Municipality Approves Six-Month Moratorium on Drilling
On January 14, 2019, the town of Superior, Colorado approved an ordinance placing a moratorium on oil and gas drilling for a period of six months. The ordinance was approved after receiving a notification from the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission regarding an (ultimately withdrawn) application to drill a well in the town. The town Board of Trustees has stated that it will use the time of the moratorium to study whether the approval of such drilling operations will be “sufficient to promote and protect the public health, safety, and welfare” of the town.

Pipelines: Fourth Circuit Declines to Review Virginia Permit for Atlantic Coast Pipeline
On January 14, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion denying a petition for review of a pipeline water permit (Appalachian Voices v. State Water Control Board, 2019 WL 177928).  The water permit was issued to the Atlantic Coast Pipeline by the Virginia State Water Control Board.  A coalition of environmental groups challenged the permit, alleging that the decision had been arbitrary and capricious. The Court of Appeals disagreed, finding no indication that the agency did not consider all relevant factors or that it clearly made an error in judgment.

From the National Oil & Gas Law Experts:

Pennsylvania Notices
Conservation and Natural Resources Advisory Council Meeting: January 23, 2019 - Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks:

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

Want to get updates, but prefer to listen? Check out the Shale Law Podcast! We can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.


Check the January Agricultural Law Brief! Each month we compile the biggest legal developments in agriculture. If you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe!

Monday, February 1, 2016

COGCC Adopts New Regulations Concerning Oil and Gas Location Assessment Permits

On January 25, 2016, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission adopted new regulations pertaining to oil and gas location assessment permits (Form 2A), which reflect two recommendations proposed by the Governor’s Task Force on State and Local Regulation of Oil and Gas Operations.

The Task Force has been working on those regulations since last year and largely focused on how to implement Recommendations 17 and 20. Recommendation 17 addressed enhancement of the coordination between operators and local governments concerning locations for “Large Scale Oil and Gas Facilities” in “Urban Mitigation Areas” while Recommendation 20 proposed to integrate future oil and gas drilling and production facilities in existing local comprehensive planning processes.

The Commission conducted two hearings in November 2015 to discuss the regulations and finally reached a consensus on January 25. According to a media report, “seven other recommendations are still being dealt with by the state legislature, other agencies, or COGCC on a non-rulemaking basis.”

Written by Chloe Marie - Research Fellow
02/01/2016

Monday, November 16, 2015

COGGC Holds Hearing on Draft Proposed Rules Addressing Future Oil and Gas Development Locations

The Colorado Oil and Gas Commission (COGCC) is holding a public hearing today in Denver, Colorado, on the Governor’s Oil and Gas Task Force rulemaking process to implement final recommendations #17 and #20. Those recommendations are part of COGGC staff’s proposal issued in October 2015 to amend the Commission Rules of Practice and Procedures.

The purpose of the recommendations is to support a strategic collaboration between local governments and oil and gas operators in order to facilitate oil and gas development through sustainable planning in the region.

Recommendation #17 encourages local governments to further participate in designating the locations of “large oil and gas facilities” within “Urban Mitigation Areas” in cooperation with oil and gas operators. This early planning participation would “provide an opportunity to address location of right-of-way for pipelines, facility consolidation, access routes, and to otherwise mitigate impacts within the Urban Mitigation Area” to avoid potential community conflicts.

Recommendation #20 would extend registration of all COGCC-registered operators with Local Government Designees (LGD) with the objective for local governments of integrating operational information in their existing planning processes.

More information on the Governor’s Task Force rulemaking is available at http://cogcc.state.co.us/reg.html#/rules/gtfrulemaking

Written by Chloe Marie - Research Fellow
11/16/2015