Showing posts with label Sunoco. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sunoco. Show all posts

Monday, March 2, 2020

Shale Law Weekly Review - March 2, 2020

Written by:
Sara Jenkins – Research Assistant 
Jackie Schweichler – Staff Attorney
Brennan Weintraub – Research Assistant
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national and international legal developments relevant to shale gas. 
Pipelines: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments Related to Construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Across the Appalachian Trail
On February 24, 2020 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments related to construction of the Atlantic Coast pipeline across the Appalachian Trail (Atlantic Coast Pipeline v. Cowpasture River Preservation Ass’n, No. 18-1587).  On June 25, 2019, Atlantic Coast Pipeline filed a Petition asking the Supreme Court to review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.  The Fourth Circuit ruled that the U.S. Forest Service did not have the authority to grant a special use permit giving the Atlantic Coast Pipeline a right-of-way for construction across the Appalachian Trail on land located in the George Washington National Forest. Typically, the Supreme Court accepts 100 to 150 cases out of over 7,000 cases that are petitioned to the Court each year. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision by the end of their current term, sometime in June or July of this year. 

Municipal Regulation: California Energy Commission Approves Local Ordinances Limiting Natural Gas in New Residential Construction
On February 20, 2020, the California Energy Commission approved various local ordinance applications requiring new residential construction to be all-electric.  Several local jurisdictions including Santa Rosa, Mountain View, Windsor, and Los Gatos sought to exclude natural gas completely from new residential construction.  Other local jurisdictions including Berkeley, Palo Alto, Milpitas, Healdsburg, and Brisbane require electricity for most uses in new construction while allowing natural gas for limited use in fireplaces and cooking.  Most of the local ordinance proposals also included requirements for installing solar panels on new residential construction. Additionally, Berkeley, Mountain View, and Palo Alto ordinances limit natural gas usage in some new commercial construction. 

Municipal Regulation: Arizona Governor Signs Bill Preventing Municipalities from Denying Building Permits Based on Utility Provider
On February 21, 2020, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed House Bill 2686 preventing municipalities from denying building permits based on the proposed utility provider for the project.  The bill also states that municipalities cannot restrict the use of a particular utility by issuing fees that would be higher than fees imposed on other utility providers.  The bill restricts the use of fines, penalties, or other requirements that may restrict a “utility provider’s authority to operate or serve customers.”  The bill also extends the same language to counties issuing building permits for construction costing $1,000 or more.

Wildlife Habitat: Idaho District Court Approves Injunction on Oil and Gas Leases within Sage Grouse Habitat Areas
On February 27, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho issued a decision granting an injunction against oil and gas leases within federally recognized sage grouse habitat areas (Western Watersheds Project v. Zinke, No. 1:18-cv-00187-REB).  In doing so, the court set aside June and September 2018 oil and gas lease sales in Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. (pg. 4). Petitioners, Western Watersheds Project and Center for Biological Diversity, argued that new lease issuing procedures used by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) did not allow for proper public input regarding the leases’ effects on sage grouse populations. (pg. 2).  Petitioners requested the preliminary injunction until BLM could change its leasing procedures though notice-and-comment rulemaking. (pg. 2).  The court ultimately agreed with Petitioners and reinstated the previous leasing procedures that were issued in 2010. 

Pipelines: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Motions to Amend and Approve Settlement Agreement with Sunoco Pipeline
On February 27, 2020, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission filed a motion to amend and approve a settlement with Sunoco Pipeline, LLC following a 2017 leak of the Mariner East 1 Pipeline in Morgantown, Pennsylvania.  The Commission's motion amends the settlement that was previously approved by an Administrative Law Judge in December 2019.  The proposed amendments are related to a Remaining Life Study that the parties agreed was necessary to determine the pipeline’s remaining life related to age, coating, and soil conditions. In the motion, the Commission clarified that while Sunoco would choose three experts to complete the study, the ultimate decision on which expert will be used falls with the Commission’s Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement.  The Commission also sought to add a provision requiring the expert’s disclosure of any projects previously worked on involving Sunoco or Sunoco’s parent company.  The motion will be approved as a Modified Settlement Agreement if no adverse comments are received within 10 days of the motion. 

Public Lands: Report Claims $12.4 Billion in Federal Revenue Lost as a Result of Outdated Royalty Rates 
In February 2020, Taxpayers for Common Sense issued a report claiming that the federal government had lost $12.4 billion in revenue due to outdated royalty rates.  The report states that the Mineral Leasing Act set the royalty rate for oil and gas extraction on federal lands at 12.5 percent in 1920. (pg. 2).  The Bush Administration increased royalty rates for offshore drilling to 18.75 percent, but the rate for onshore drilling has remained the same. The study calculated that if onshore royalty rates had been increased to 18.75 percent at the same time as offshore rates, the federal government would have collected an additional $12.4 billion in royalties.
From the National Oil & Gas Law Experts:
George A. Bibikos, At the Well Weekly (Feb. 21, 2020)
John McFarland, The Future of Alternative Energy (Feb. 24, 2020)

AGENCY PRESS RELEASES—STATE/FEDERAL
Pennsylvania Department of Energy Press Releases:
No new releases Feb. 24- Mar. 2, 2020.

U.S. Department of Energy

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

STATE ACTIONS—EXECUTIVE/LEGISLATIVE
Pennsylvania Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
50 Pa.B. 1320, “Liquefied Petroleum Gas Facility; Notice of Application” Notice (Feb. 29, 2020) 

Pennsylvania Legislature:
The House will reconvene on Monday, March 16, 2020 at 1:00PM
The Senate will reconvene on Monday, March 16, 2020 at 1:00PM unless sooner recalled by the Pres. Pro Temp.

FEDERAL ACTIONS—EXECUTIVE/LEGISLATIVE
Federal Executive Agencies—Actions and Notices: 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
85 FR 10666, “Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Document for a Proposed Amendment of the Northeast Supply Enhancement Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues” Notice (Feb. 25, 2020)
85 FR 11064, “Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Southgate Project” Notice (Feb. 26, 2020)
85 FR 11066, “North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review of the North Baja XPress Project” Notice (Feb. 26, 2020)
85 FR 11360, “Texas Eastern Transmission, LP; Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review of the Middlesex Extension Project” Notice (Feb. 27, 2020)
85 FR 11361, “Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC; Southern Natural Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Application” Notice (Feb. 27, 2020)
85 FR 12280, “Texas Eastern Transmission, LP; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Lily Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues” Notice (Mar. 2, 2020)

Land Management Bureau
85 FR 10617, “Onshore Oil and Gas Operations - Annual Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustments” Rule (Feb. 25, 2020)

House Energy and Commerce Committee Actions:
No new actions Feb. 25- Mar. 2, 2020

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Actions: 
No new actions Feb. 25–Mar. 2, 2020.
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks:
“Pitt Fossil Fuel Disinvestment Activists Begin Occupation of Cathedral,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.
Want to get updates, but prefer to listen? Check out the Shale Law Podcast! We can always be found on our Libsyn page, iTunes, Spotify, or Stitcher.
Check out the February Agricultural Law Brief ! Each month we compile the most significant legal developments in agriculture. If you’d like to receive this update via email, check out our website and subscribe!

Monday, February 12, 2018

The Shale Law Weekly Review - February 12, 2018

Written by:
Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator
Tori Wunder - Research Assistant

The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.

Pipelines: DEP Imposes Penalty and Allows Sunoco to Resume Work on Mariner East 2
On February 8, 2018, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) filed a Consent Order and Agreement with Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. (Sunoco) allowing work to resume on the Mariner East 2 pipeline.  The order imposes a $12.6 million civil penalty on Sunoco for permitting violations. In January, DEP ordered Sunoco to suspend all work after drilling fluids were discharged without a permit. In addition, Sunoco failed to obtain permit authorization prior to conducting horizontal directional drilling activities. The Mariner East 2 is a 20-inch pipeline project that expands the capacity of the current Mariner East 1 to 345 thousand barrels per day of natural gas liquids.

Pipelines: Immediate Access to Disputed Properties Granted to MVP 
On February 2, 2018, a federal judge in West Virginia granted Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP) immediate access to disputed lands along the path of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP v. Simmons, et al., 1:17-cv-00211). The court states that in order to access the disputed properties, MVP must deposit certified checks and post surety bonds worth several times more than the appraised easement value. The court concluded that MVP has met eminent domain requirements and is authorized to immediately access the properties. The determination was based upon MVP’s showing that it would be “irreparably harmed in the absence of a preliminary injunction,” that this harm is not outweighed by the concerns of the defendants, and that granting access is in the public interest.

Pipelines: FERC Allows Rover Pipeline to Continue Drilling Under Tuscarawas River
On February 6, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved the revised drilling plan submitted by Rover Pipeline, LLC (Rover) and issued an order authorizing Rover ro recommence drilling at the Tuscarawas River. FERC ordered Rover to cease drilling at the end of January after drilling fluid was lost.  Rover was asked to submit information on how they planned to address drilling fluid losses. In addition, Rover was told to provide a revised drilling plan with a feasibility analysis of alternate crossing locations at the Tuscarawas River. The Rover pipeline is designed to transport 3.25 bcf/d of Marcellus and Utica shale natural gas along 713 miles of pipeline.

Oil and Gas Leasing: Lawsuits Filed Against BLM for Alaskan Oil and Gas Lease Sale
On February 2, 2018, two lawsuits were filed by several environmental and conservation groups against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for petroleum lease sales in northern Alaska. The first lawsuit, filed by Earthjustice, alleged that BLM failed to fulfill its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 2016 and 2017 when it held oil and gas lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve - Alaska (Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. Ryan Zinke, et al.) In the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that BLM acted arbitrarily and capriciously by foregoing NEPA analysis, and the plaintiffs request that the 2016 and 2017 be vacated. The second lawsuit was filed by several groups including the Alaska Wilderness League, the Northern Alaska Environmental Center, and The Wilderness League. In this lawsuit the plaintiffs also allege that BLM violated NEPA during the 2016 and 2017 oil and gas lease sale.

Pipelines: FERC Files New Environmental Impact Statement for Southeast Market Pipeline Project
On February 5, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) filed a new Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Southeast Market Pipelines Project (Project). The new EIS was filed in response to a court order issued in August 2017. In the court order, the judge stated that the initial EIS was inadequate because it did not contain sufficient information on the greenhouse gas emissions that would occur as a result of pipeline use.  The Project is comprised of three natural gas pipelines including the Sabal Trail Project, the Florida Southeast Connection, and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company LLC’s Hillabee Expansion Project.

Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks

Connect with us on Facebook! Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and activities from the week.

See our Global Shale Law Compendium and this week’s article,
Shale Governance in the Netherlands


Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located here.