Written by:
Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator
Tori Wunder - Research Assistant
Jacqueline Schweichler - Education Programs Coordinator
Tori Wunder - Research Assistant
The following information is an update of recent local, state, national, and international legal developments relevant to shale gas.
Municipal Regulation:
Sanctions Imposed Against Attorneys in Grant Township Lawsuit
On January 5, 2018, the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued an order imposing sanctions against two attorneys defending Grant Township’s Community Bill of Rights. The Pennsylvania General Energy Company, LLC (PGE) received approval for an injection well in May 2014. In June 2014, Grant Township adopted a Community Bill of Rights that prohibits wastewater disposal from oil and gas activities. PGE subsequently filed this lawsuit arguing that the Community Bill of Rights is unconstitutional and invalid. According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the $52,000 sanction was imposed for pursuing “frivolous claims and defenses.” The case is entitled Pennsylvania General Electric Company, LLC v. Grant Township. For more information on the timeline of this case, see our Shale Law in the Spotlight article from last fall.
On January 5, 2018, the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued an order imposing sanctions against two attorneys defending Grant Township’s Community Bill of Rights. The Pennsylvania General Energy Company, LLC (PGE) received approval for an injection well in May 2014. In June 2014, Grant Township adopted a Community Bill of Rights that prohibits wastewater disposal from oil and gas activities. PGE subsequently filed this lawsuit arguing that the Community Bill of Rights is unconstitutional and invalid. According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the $52,000 sanction was imposed for pursuing “frivolous claims and defenses.” The case is entitled Pennsylvania General Electric Company, LLC v. Grant Township. For more information on the timeline of this case, see our Shale Law in the Spotlight article from last fall.
Production and
Operation: The Ohio Supreme Court Rules That There is No Implied Covenant for
Further Exploration
On January 3, 2018, the
Ohio Supreme Court decided that there is no implied covenant for further
exploration contained within oil and gas leases. In Alford v. Collins-McGregor, the court determined
that drillers are not required to explore deeper strata for oil and gas under
their lease, so long as they “reasonably develop.” In Alford, the
landowners requested, and were denied, a partial termination of their leases
because the lessee had failed to explore deeper into the formation. Ohio’s
rejection of the implied covenant to explore further brings them in line with
the Texas and Oklahoma supreme courts, who have also rejected the covenant.
Municipal Regulation:
Pennsylvania Appeals Court Rules That Township Residents May Not intervene in
Gas Facility Zoning
On January 11, 2018, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in the case
regarding the proposed MarkWest Energy Partners, LP natural gas compressor
station to be built in Cecil Township. Some residents of Cecil Township are
attempting to intervene in the zoning approval of the station, raising
opposition to its construction. The court upheld the decision of the trial
court and ruled against the residents, stating in part that they had waited too
long before intervening.
Pipelines: FERC Denies
Request to Stay Construction of the NEXUS Pipeline
On January 10, 2018, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) declined to issue a stay of construction for the NEXUS pipeline project. In
September 2017, the Sierra Club and several environmental organizations filed
requests for rehearing and requested a stay of construction. The environmental
groups argued that their request for rehearing raised substantial questions and
there would be no remedy to the environmental impact of the pipeline once it
has been fully completed. FERC, however, concluded that the environmental
groups were unable to establish that they would suffer irreparable harm absent
a stay and that delay of the project would be adverse to public interest.
Pipelines: FERC Denies
Petition from Constitution Pipeline in Favor of New York DEC
On January 11, 2018, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order
declining to declare that the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (New York DEC) waived its authority to issue a water quality certification
for the Constitution Pipeline. The Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC (Constitution) first applied for a certificate of public
convenience and necessity in June 2013. In April 2016, New York DEC denied
Constitution’s application and Constitution filed a petition
with FERC requesting an order stating that New York DEC had waived their
authority by failing to act within a “reasonable period of time.” In its order,
FERC ruled that New York DEC acted appropriately and within the one-year
timeframe, given the changes and resubmissions of Constitution’s application.
Climate Change: New York
City Sues Fossil Fuel Companies for Climate Change Damages
On January 9, 2018, New
York City filed a lawsuit against
several oil and gas companies for contributing to climate change (City of New York v. BP P.L.C., et al. Case No. 18 v. 182).
The lawsuit includes charges of public nuisance, private nuisance, and
trespass. The complaint alleges that these corporations produced, marketed, and
sold fossil fuels with the knowledge that fossil fuels exacerbate global
warming. New York City alleges that they have suffered damages including
“inundation, erosion, and regular tidal flooding of its property.” According to
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, the
city has experiences billions of dollars of damage as a result of climate
change. In addition to the lawsuit, New York City announced plans to
divest up to $5 billion in fossil fuel investments.
Follow us on Twitter at PSU Ag & Shale Law (@AgShaleLaw) to receive ShaleLaw HotLinks
“Economic Impact of Sunoco’s Mariner East More Than
Double What Was Originally Projected"
- Vista Today
"For those living along Sunoco's Mariner East 2
pipeline, a human chain of frustration"
- Post-Gazette
"Oil and gas drilling permits remain strong in Ohio,
Pa." - Farm & Dairy
"Chesapeake willing to settle shale royalty dispute
in Pa." - Shale Gas Reporter
Connect with us on Facebook!
Every week we will post the CASL Ledger which details all our publications and
activities from the week.
See our Global Shale Law Compendium and this week’s article, Shale Law Governance in Pennsylvania - Legislation from 2013 to 2016.
Check out this week’s
Shale Law in the Spotlight:
Oil and Natural Gas Severance Taxes in the United States
(North Dakota, Arkansas, Colorado, and New Mexico)
Stay informed with our monthly Agricultural Law Brief located
here.
Togel Online Terpercaya
ReplyDeleteAgen Togel
Situs Togel Online
Situs Togel Terpercaya