On September 30, 2015, the
U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming granted
all motions for preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the BLM rule
governing hydraulic fracturing on federal and tribal lands. The Independent
Petroleum Association in America and Western Energy Alliance, the states of
Wyoming and Colorado, the state of North Dakota, and the Ute Indian Tribe
separately filed these motions.
In the light of the
Petitioners’ arguments in support of their motions, the District Court opined
that the BLM did not receive authority from Congress to regulate hydraulic
fracturing. The Court found that Congress “has directly spoken to the issue,”
and therefore, the BLM invaded Congressional authority in this matter. Furthermore,
the District Court expressed objections as to the evidentiary support for the
rule while observing that “[t]he BLM has neither substantiated the existence of
a problem this rule is meant to address, identified a gap in existing
regulations the final rule will fill, nor described how the final rule will
achieve its stated objectives. Rather, the Fracking Rule seems a remedy in
search of harm.”
The District Court
concluded that all petitioners are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the
absence of a preliminary injunction which undermines the proper balance between
federal and states regulatory interests in the regulation of hydraulic
fracturing.
Further information on
the cases is available at docket no. 2:15-CV-043-SWS and docket no.
2:15-CV-041-SWS.
Written by Chloe Marie - Research Fellow
10/01/2015
No comments:
Post a Comment